Legal Opinion

MIOP, INC. v. City of Grand Rapids

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided October 15, 2001No. 1:01-cv-00335PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are the Plaintiff MIOP, Inc.’s (“MIOP”) and Defendants City of Grand Rapids and Grand Rapids City Commission’s (collectively the “City”) cross motions for summary judgment on Count I of Plaintiffs complaint and Defendants’ motion to dismiss Counts II through VI. Plaintiff seeks to construct a 150 foot tower at 2340 Dean Lake Road for the provision of personal communication services (“PCS”). Defendants have denied Plaintiff a “Permitted With Approval Use” for the construction of the tower. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Iowa Wireless Servs. LP v. City of Moline, Ill.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. T-Mobile Central, LLC v. Charter Township of West BloomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. Charter Township of BrandonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  3. T-MOBILE CENTRAL LLC v. City of FraserDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. Cellco Partnership v. FRANKLIN COUNTY, KY.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API