Legal Opinion

Cellco Partnership v. FRANKLIN COUNTY, KY.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided April 18, 2008No. Civil Action 3:07-34PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KAREN K. CALDWELL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (Rec. Nos. 26 and 27). The Plaintiffs challenge the Frankfort/Franklin County Planning Commission’s denial of an application to construct a cell phone tower. For the following reasons, the Court will grant the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment with regard to their claim under the Telecommunications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., and will otherwise deny it; and the Court will deny the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.

I. FACTS.

The Plaintiff Célico…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. PI Telecom Infrastructure V, LLC v. Georgetown-Scott County Planning CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API