Legal Opinion

T-MOBILE CENTRAL LLC v. City of Fraser

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 10, 2009No. Civil 08-11878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOHN FEIKENS, District Judge.

This case arises from a denial by the City of Fraser of T-Mobile’s application for a zoning variance. T-Mobile seeks to fill a gap in its cellular telephone coverage through the installation a 120 foot monopole on property zoned for commercial use in Fraser. Fraser’s zoning regulations limit the height of structures to 25 feet. When Fraser rejected T-Mobile’s application for a zoning variance, T-Mobile appealed to this Court, arguing that Fraser’s decision is contrary to federal law, because it has “the effect of prohibiting…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Town of Amherst v. Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Thomas v. HalterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. T-Mobile Central, LLC v. Charter Township of West BloomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. New York SMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Village of Floral Park Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API