Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1959No. C. D. 3602PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

The Washington state bar association, by its complaint, verified by its president, charged respondent, James B. Carroll, who was admitted to the practice of law by this court on August 25, 1950 (and thereafter practiced law in Seattle), with appropriating to his own use the sum of $2,500 belonging to a client, Donald W. Rogers, and with failing to prosecute the personal injury claim of another client, C. Joseph Booth, by whom respondent had been retained.

Pursuant to Rule for Discipline of Attorneys 13, 34A Wn. (2d) 185, a copy of the complaint, together with a notice requiring him to appear…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BeakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against ParkWashington Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re RoselliniWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against HutchinsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against ChantryWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against RoselliniWashington Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API