Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Park

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1954No. C. D. 4244PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

We are called upon to consider the recommendation of the board of governors of the Washington state bar association that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of sixty days, based upon a finding by the trial committee that

“. . . the respondent, William U. Park, violated his oath and duties as an attorney and the Canons of Ethics of the profession, particularly Canon No. 11, by his failure to report, account for and turn over to his client the money and property of such client, and by his commingling with his own and converting to his own use the money of his client”;

and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BeakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re PetersMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. In Re the Petition for Reinstatement of GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re RoselliniWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against HutchinsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API