Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against Chantry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1965No. C.D. 3697PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

— The Board of Governors of the Washington State Bar Association, having reviewed the evidence and the findings of fact and conclusions of its hearing panel, recommends to this court that Arthur S. W. Chantry be disbarred from the practice of law in this jurisdiction for violation of Canons of Professional Ethics 11 and 29, and Rule for Discipline of Attorneys 1A (as adopted November 2, 1960), RCW vol. 0.

February 26, 1951, Arthur S. W. Chantry was admitted to the practice of law in the State of Washington. September 19, 1964, respondent acknowledged in writing due service of the Association’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ryan v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against HutchinsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. In Re RoselliniWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hawkins v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. In Re the Reinstatement of ChantryWashington Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API