Legal Opinion

Hazlett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1942No. 28446PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.

This is an action by Louis B. Hazlett and wife, mortgagors, against a mortgagee to recover for damage resulting from the alleged breach of a contract to procure fire insurance on the mortgaged premises. A trial to the court and a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. Timely motions by defendant for a directed verdict, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and for a new trial were denied; and, from the judgment entered on the verdict, it has taken this appeal.

The principal question presented by appellant’s assignments of error is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Asher Bros. General Illuminating Co. v. General Illuminating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. NicholasWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Marsh v. Usk Hardware Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Olds Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hidden v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spooner v. Reserve Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Buyken v. ErtnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. East Providence Credit Union v. GeremiaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  4. Hellbaum v. Burwell & MorfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  5. Shaw v. GeorgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API