Legal Opinion

Hellbaum v. Burwell & Morford

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 31, 1969No. 55-40397-1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Horowitz, A. C. J.

Plaintiffs sued defendant corporation Burwell and Morford (Burwell), a mortgage broker and insurance agent, for damages caused by Burwell’s failure to provide adequate fire insurance on plaintiffs’ house. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for the plaintiffs contending that the evidence is insufficient to warrant any such judgment and that alternatively defendant is entitled to a new trial.

We must assume the truth of the plaintiffs’ evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom and interpret the evidence below most strongly against the defendant…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Corbit v. J. I. Case Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Elam v. Smithdeal Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Elam v. . Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hansen v. RothausWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. McAlvain v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Keller Lorenz Co. v. Insurance Associates Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gorge Lumber Co. v. Brazier Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API