Hellbaum v. Burwell & Morford
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Horowitz, A. C. J.
Plaintiffs sued defendant corporation Burwell and Morford (Burwell), a mortgage broker and insurance agent, for damages caused by Burwell’s failure to provide adequate fire insurance on plaintiffs’ house. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for the plaintiffs contending that the evidence is insufficient to warrant any such judgment and that alternatively defendant is entitled to a new trial.
We must assume the truth of the plaintiffs’ evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom and interpret the evidence below most strongly against the defendant…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Corbit v. J. I. Case Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Elam v. Smithdeal Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Elam v. . Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Hansen v. RothausWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- McAlvain v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Keller Lorenz Co. v. Insurance Associates Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Gorge Lumber Co. v. Brazier Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.