Legal Opinion

Shaw v. George

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1966No. File 10250PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Judge.

This is an action in forcible entry and detainer certified by a justice of the peace to the circuit court. Trial was had to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. The trial court granted motion of the plaintiff for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. From this judgment defendants have appealed.

The complaint alleges that by virtue of a contract for deed dated October 30, 1964, plaintiff is entitled to possession of the premises in question; that defendant Henry George became a lessee under a written lease with the former owner for a two-year term…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. MatsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Halligan v. FreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Kelly v. GramSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Grigsby v. Western Union Tel. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hazlett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rousseau v. GesingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. LPN Trust v. Farrar Outdoor Advertising, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Farmers Elevator Co. of Elk Point v. LyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Heiser v. RodwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API