Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Eason
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided March 28, 2003No. 1:01-cr-00068PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CUMMINGS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Phillip Thompson, acting pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging employees of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division (“TDCJ-ID”) French Robertson (“Robertson”) Unit retaliated against him, failed to protect him from assaults and threats by prison gang members, and interfered with his constitutional right to practice his religion. Thompson seeks injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and monetary damages.
BACKGROUND
On April 18, 2001, Thompson and Carl Davis, acting jointly, filed a civil…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Morgan v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- Jones v. FJC Security Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- 15625 Ft. Bend Ltd. v. Sentry Select InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- A F C O Credit Corp v. Cross Country Management L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2024
- AT&T Corp. v. Acilis Backbone Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.