Legal Opinion

United States v. Borkowski

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 24, 1920PublishedCited by 108 opinions

Criminal prosecution by the United States against Felix Borkowski and John Lucas. On application for return of property seized.

1Opinion of the Court

SATER, District Judge.

[1] This case is one of several, in which application was made, prior to entering upon trial, for the return of property seized without a search warrant, or on the alleged ground that the warrant on which the officers acted in making the seizure and the affidavit on which such warrant was based were insufficient. It is appropriate that in deciding this case I should, on account of the rather unusual situation existing here, say something that may operate as a guide in the future on the subject of search warrants. The government’s officers and those whom they called to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Kurtz v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Bad Elk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. West v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Garske v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. United States v. KaplanDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1923

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API