Legal Opinion

United States v. Solomon

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 27, 1929No. 8754PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

Upon the motion of the defendants Zinno and Drago to declare a search and seizure illegal and to suppress evidence obtained thereby, evidence was received establishing the following facts:

These defendants occupied, as lessees, a shed or outbuilding detached and situated about 75 feet from a dwelling house on a farm in Lawrence, Mass. They did not reside on-the premises. They had set up and were operating in the leased building a redistilling plant.

On the morning of the 30th day of March, 1929, a federal prohibition agent, upon information received by him, went to- the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Kurtz v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. LotempioDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
  2. Clyde Albert Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Clyde Albert Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Murphy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. United States v. 135,019 Gallons, More or Less of WineDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API