United States v. Solomon
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
Upon the motion of the defendants Zinno and Drago to declare a search and seizure illegal and to suppress evidence obtained thereby, evidence was received establishing the following facts:
These defendants occupied, as lessees, a shed or outbuilding detached and situated about 75 feet from a dwelling house on a farm in Lawrence, Mass. They did not reside on-the premises. They had set up and were operating in the leased building a redistilling plant.
On the morning of the 30th day of March, 1929, a federal prohibition agent, upon information received by him, went to- the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Kurtz v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. LotempioDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
- Clyde Albert Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Clyde Albert Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Murphy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- United States v. 135,019 Gallons, More or Less of WineDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1931