Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 25, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

The motion to dismiss the appeal because it was prayed, granted, and perfected after the time for appeal had expired is overruled. The decree was rendered January 28, 1933, and a petition for a rehearing was filed on that same date, but was not overruled until April 17, 1933, at which time an appeal was prayed and granted, and bond was filed, but the decree was entered as of March 18, 1933, nunc pro tunc. The entry of a motion for a new trial suspends the judgment until it is disposed of, and a petition to rehear likewise suspends the decree pending the disposition of the petition to rehear.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jordan v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Colbert v. BondTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Baker v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Swift & Co. v. Memphis Cold Storage Warehouse Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Wright v. DormanTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bradford v. American Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  2. James v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  3. Tritschler v. CartwrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Brown v. L. A. Wells Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Vanhooser v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API