Wright v. Dorman
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice GreeN
This appeal involved the question of the liability of a surety upon a bond taken in certain proceedings below. The Chancellor discharged the surety.
In 1920 J. H. Wright and C. W. Dorman entered into a trade whereby Wright was to convey to Dorman a farm in Franklin County, and in exchange for the farm Dorman was to convey to Wright certain property in Nashville, including a grocery store. Wright took possession of the grocery store but the parties got into a dispute about that time and the trade was not completed. No effort was made to comply with the provisions of the Bulk Sales Law, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Wolf v. StixSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Dunn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Payne v. AbleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870
- Brown & Brown Coal Co. v. AntezakMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jerkins v. McKinneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Heatherly v. HadleyOregon Supreme Court · 1869
- England v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Still v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- Newton Finance Corp. v. ConnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.