Legal Opinion

Farrington v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1951No. 7579, 7580, 7581 and 7582PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

These four actions were on four identical fire insurance policies issued by the defendant companies to the plaintiff on the same building. The actions were combined for trial in the lower court and are treated together here. The building was destroyed by fire and a jury found against the defendant companies for the full amount of their coverage. Defendants appeal asserting they were not bound on the policy because (1) the subject matter of the policy described as “a building occupied as a skating rink” did not exist as such at the time the policy was issued, and (2) there…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Indiana Insurance v. HartwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Harris v. Meyers (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Barone v. Aetna Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Improved-Match Co. v. Michigan Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Goldstone v. Columbia Life & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Blinzler v. AndrewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hass v. WentzlaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Vina v. Jefferson Insurance Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Continental Insurance Co. v. KingstonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  5. Equitable Life & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Virgil N. Lee, Equitable Life & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Margaret L. PagettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API