Legal Opinion

Indiana Insurance v. Hartwell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1890No. 14,141PublishedCited by 41 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.

The appellee sued the appellant on a fire insurance policy.

*179The appellant answered in three paragraphs, and the appellee replied in two paragraphs, the second paragraph being the general denial.

The third paragraph of answer cut no figure in the court below, nor is it of any importance to the questions involved in this appeal.

The first paragraph of answer is, in substance, that, on the 5th day of February, 1881, the appellant issued the policy sued upon; that the property therein described was partially destroyed by fire on the 5th day of August, 1881 • that, on the 16th day of August, 1881,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hermann v. Niagara Fire InsururanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Pickel v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Wilson v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  5. Goddard v. Monitor Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Continental Insurance v. BairIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Aetna Ins. Co. of the Midwest v. RodriguezIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Gosch v. Firemen's InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Dodge v. Grain Shippers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API