Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance Co. v. Kingston

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 26, 2005No. 20030936-CAPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 Joseph O. Kingston and D.U. Company, Inc. appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Continental Insurance Company premised on a theory of misrepresentation in an insurance application. We conclude the insurance company waived any right it had to rescind the policy and reverse the summary judgment.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Except as otherwise noted, the key facts are not in dispute and may be summarized as follows. Joseph O. Kingston bought a home built in the 1800s in Bountiful, Utah, from D.U. Company, Inc. (DUC). Kingston subsequently applied for automobile…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dugan v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Soter's, Inc. v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Baldwin v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Johnson v. Life Ins. Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  5. K & T, INC. v. KoroulisUtah Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DOCTORS'COMPANY v. DrezgaUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  4. House of Flavors, Inc. v. TFG Michigan, L.P.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. PHL Variable Insurance v. Sheldon Hathaway Family Insurance Trust Ex Rel. HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API