Murray v. Murray
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. E. N. Rector, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Lewis R. Works, C. Hughes Jordan, Works & Jordan, and Eugene D. Williams, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
From the evidence in this case we infer that the action was commenced on November 21, 1911. An amended complaint based on a charge of adultery was filed on February 14, 1912. In that complaint no reference was made to property interests of the parties. On April 8, 1912, the cause came on for hearing upon default of the defendant. Thereafter, on October 4, 1912, an interlocutory judgment was signed by Hon. Charles Monroe, the judge of the superior court who had heard the evidence in April. This decree, entered on October 7, 1912, contained no reference to the property interests of the parties.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hogarty v. HogartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- McCahan v. McCahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Sanborn v. SanbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Boullester v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Anthony v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.