Schultz v. Dew
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Thomas C. Dew and Denise A. Dew appeal a summary judgment in favor of the claim of adverse possession made by Mark F. Schultz, Pearl E. Pepka, and Mary T. Carter (collectively referred to as Pepka). We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2] This case concerns ownership of a strip of land, 45.5 feet by 230 feet, which includes Pepka’s driveway and runs across the western edge of Dew’s property. The undisputed facts are as follows.
[¶3] On April 11, 1946, Lawrence and Pearl Pepka obtained by warranty deed the residential property described generally as Outlot 37, and a portion of Outlot…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Taylor v. TrippSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Lewis v. MoorheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Cuka v. Jamesville Hutterian Mutual SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Weisel v. HobbsNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Greene v. Morgan, Theeler, Cogley & PetersenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Titus v. ChapmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Beckel v. GerberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Underhill v. MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.