Legal Opinion

Greene v. Morgan, Theeler, Cogley & Petersen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] In 1988, attorney Jack Theeler prepared an antenuptial agreement for Terry Greene. The agreement, among other things, purported to waive any right that Greene’s fiancee would have to alimony should the couple ever divorce. When the couple ultimately divorced in 1993, the trial court awarded alimony to Greene’s wife, ruling that the part of the agreement waiving alimony was invalid under South Dakota law. Greene brought this legal malpractice action against Theeler and his law firm. The trial court granted summary judgment to Theeler and the law firm, holding that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wall v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Schoenrock v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hinkle v. HargensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Keegan v. First Bank of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Peterson v. HohmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Antone v. MirvissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API