Legal Opinion

Weisel v. Hobbs

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1940No. 30876PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

Plaintiff and appellant sought by injunction to restrain defendants and appellees from cutting down a large ornamental shade tree. Defendants by cross-petition asked that plaintiff’s garage be moved back to lot line. Trial court found for defendants, and dissolved the temporary restraining order, finding that said tree was entirely upon the real estate of defendants. The court also required plaintiff to remove the garage, which encroached upon the lot of defendants.

The petition alleged that defendants Hobbs are the record owners of lots 37 and 38, block 2, Arlington Heights addition, being on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robinson v. ClappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  2. Wideman v. FaivreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Dubois v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  4. Gentry v. BurgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Cobb v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TrippSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Happy Bunch, LLC v. Grandview North, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Happy Bunch, LLC v. Grandview North, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Mader v. MettenbrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Schultz v. DewSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API