Legal Opinion

Beckel v. Gerber

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1998No. 20018PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Majorie Beckel (Marjorie) suffered the loss of use of a kidney in 1994. She alleges it occurred because, in 1979, Dr. Bernard Gerber had negligently placed a metal hemoclip in her body cutting off the blood flow to her ureter. Marjorie and her husband (collectively referred to as Beckels) brought suit against Dr. Gerber and St. Luke’s Midland Regional Medical Center in Aberdeen, South Dakota (Hospital). The trial court granted summary judgment to Dr. Gerber and Hospital holding the statute of limitations had run. It also held the continuing tort exception was not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Schoenrock v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Alberts v. GiebinkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Pitt-Hart v. Sanford USD Medical CenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Fin-Ag, Inc. v. Pipestone Livestock Auction Market, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Argus Leader v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Burgard v. Benedictine Living CommunitiesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API