Danley v. Merced Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff, the appellant herein, as an owner of land situated in the county of Merced and within the exterior boundaries of the Merced Irrigation District, 'began this action for the purpose of restraining the irrigation district and its directors from entering into a certain contract obligating the district to pay to certain persons, hereafter designated as contract holders, annually for seventeen years the sum of $70,000 and upward.
The trial court sustained the defendants’ demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend and thereafter entered judgment in favor of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. Linda Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Re Harper Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- San Francisco Fire Fighters Local 798 v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Bottoms v. Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Humboldt Bay Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Willard v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.