Legal Opinion

San Francisco Fire Fighters Local 798 v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2006No. S131818PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

In this case, we consider a provision of the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco that requires disputes between the City and County of San Francisco (the City) and unions representing firefighters and other public safety officers, after bargaining to impasse, to be submitted to binding arbitration. An exception to this binding arbitration requirement is any rule or policy “necessary to ensure compliance with . . . anti-discrimination laws.” (S.F. Charter, § A8.590-5(g)(3).) We are called on to decide whether a rule changing the method by which applicants are…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Connecticut v. TealSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. The Association Of Mexican-American Educators v. State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Citizens for East Shore Parks v. State Lands CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. In re CabreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Batt v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. HOME BUILDERS ASSN. OF TULARE/KINGS COUNTIES, INC. v. City of LemooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Santa Clara County Correctional Peace Officers' Ass'n v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API