B.K.B. v. M.M.K.

OPINION BY

POPOVICH, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant B.K.B.1 appeals the order denying his petition to intervene on grounds that the trial court erred in doing so based upon the doctrine of paternity by estoppel; that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to hear DNA evidence to establish Appellant as the biological father of K.J.K., the minor-child; and that the trial court erred in failing to acknowledge that Appellee M.M.K.2 engaged in fraud or misrepresentation regarding the parentage of K.J.K. (d.o.b. 5/4/97). We affirm.

¶ 2 The pertinent facts and procedural history of this case are as…