Legal Opinion

Vargo v. Schwartz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 2007PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

McCAFFERY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Richard K. Schwartz, appeals from the trial court order directing him to provide support for two children. Specifically, Appellant asks us to determine whether the trial court committed reversible error by failing to conclude that the children were born of the marriage between Appellee (Victoria L. Vargo, the children’s mother) and her husband. Following careful review, we affirm.

¶ 2 The facts and procedural history underlying this case are as follows. Appellee (hereinafter “Mother”) married Kevin Var-go in 1989 and remained married to him at all times…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. John M. v. Paula T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Brinkley v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Jones v. TrojakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. In Re Adoption of S.A.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. In re Interest of S.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Rohm and Haas Co. v. LinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Orange Stones Co. v. City of Reading, Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. K.E.M. v. P.C.S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Black v. Labor Ready, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. K.E.M. v. P.C.S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API