Brinkley v. King
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*244 OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.
One of the strongest presumptions in Pennsylvania law is that a child conceived or born in a marriage is a child of the marriage. In order to rebut the présumption it must be proved by clear and convincing evidence that at the time of conception, the husband either was not physically capable of procreation or had no access to the wife. The issue in this case is whether the presumption applies to the facts of this case.
Lisa Brinkley was married to and was living with George Brinkley in February 1991, when Lisa’s daughter,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- John M. v. Paula T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Cairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Cairgle v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Jones v. TrojakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Fish v. BehersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Vargo v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- K.E.M. v. P.C.S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- C.G. v. J.H.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Strauser v. StahrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.