Jones v. Trojak
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Joseph Trojak (“Trojak”), appeals from the Order of the Superior Court affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas that blood tests had been properly ordered and reversing the determination of paternity. This case presents two issues for our review. The first is whether an order by a trial judge that parties to a paternity suit submit to a blood test is appealable. 1 The second issue is whether blood tests were properly ordered. Our determination of that depends on whether Appellee, Kathryn Jones (“Jones”), overcame the presumption that her child is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Marriage of RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- John M. v. Paula T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Cairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- McMillen v. McMillenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Brinkley v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Fish v. BehersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Vargo v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Freedman v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- K.E.M. v. P.C.S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.