Legal Opinion

New Mercur Mining Co. v. South Mercur Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1942No. 6392PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

Respondent New Mercur Mining Company, brought suit to quiet title on November 2, 1939, claiming ownership, possession, and right to possession subject to the paramount title of the United States, in and to the Violet Ray Nos. 1 to 12 lode mining locations situated in Camp Floyd Mining District, Tooele County, Utah, and alleging that appellant, South Mercur Mining Company, wrongfully claimed an adverse interest. The Snyder Mines, Incorporated as lessee of the New Mercur Mining Company joined with the respondent in an amended complaint.

The appellant by its pleadings denied such,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Chambers v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Jackson v. RobySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Klopenstine v. HaysUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Copper Mountain Mining & Smelting Co. v. Butte & Corbin Con. Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Flynn v. VevelstadDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
  2. Kramer v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Silliman v. PowellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Simmons v. MuirWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Eveleigh v. DarnielleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API