Legal Opinion
Flynn v. Vevelstad
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 9, 1954No. A-6840PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
Each party seeks the determination of the other’s adverse claim to his mining property situate on Yakobi Island, Alaska, and allegedly containing nickel ore of great value, and, in addition, the defendant seeks damages in the sum of $20,-000,000.
The plaintiff alleges that in October and November 1952, he located 102 claims in full compliance with the requirements of law and that the defendant is asserting an adverse claim to ground embraced within these locations. The defendants allege prior location of their claims, except two which were located on June 8, 1953, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- McKinley Creek Mining Co. v. Alaska United Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Walton v. Wild Goose Mining & Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Bismark Mountain Gold Mining Co. v. North Sunbeam Gold Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shope v. SimsAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Symms v. Thirteenth Judicial District of the State of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Pinkerton v. MooreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- United States v. BradtDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1968
- Atherley v. Bullion Monarch Uranium CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.