Legal Opinion

Copper Mountain Mining & Smelting Co. v. Butte & Corbin Con. Copper & Silver Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1909No. 2,678PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Jefferson County; Lew. L. Calla-way, Judge. Action by the Copper Mountain Mining and Smelting Company against the Butte & Corbin Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals from it and an order denying its motion for a new trial. In the brief the following eases are cited: Mann v. Budlong, 129 Cal. 577, 62 Pac. 120; Wright v. Killian, 132 Cal. 56, 64 Pac. 98; Gear v. Ford, 4 Cal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Jefferson County; Lew. L. Calla-way, Judge. Action by the Copper Mountain Mining and Smelting Company against the Butte & Corbin Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals from it and an order denying its motion for a new trial. In the brief the following eases are cited: Mann v. Budlong, 129 Cal. 577, 62 Pac. 120; Wright v. Killian, 132 Cal. 56, 64 Pac. 98; Gear v. Ford, 4 Cal. App. 556, 88 Pac. 600; Emerson v. McWhirter, 133 Cal. 510, 65 Pac. 1036; Hall v. Kearney, 18 Colo. 505, 3-3 Pac. 373; Lockhart v. Rollins,…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

The defendant, claiming to be the owner of certain mining ground in Jefferson county under quartz locations designated as the Mammoth, Rarus, Tucker, Anaconda, and Big Butt quartz mining claims, applied to the United States for patents therefor. The plaintiff, claiming a prior right to a portion of the ground under quartz locations designated as the Florence, Jack Taylor, Elaine, Tyrant, Sailor Boy, Stella, Forest, Black Horse, and Twin Boy, filed its adverse claims in the United States land office, and brought this action to determine the right to the possession of the portion in controversy…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Jackson v. RobySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Watkins v. WatkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Allen v. PetrickMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gibson v. Morris State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Thomas v. Standard Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Murray v. Butte-Monitor Tunnel Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Gray v. GrantMontana Supreme Court · 1922

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API