Legal Opinion

Silliman v. Powell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1982No. 17054PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Plaintiffs commenced this action to quiet title to certain unpatented lode mining claims in Grand County, Utah, and to recover damages for slander of title and for the removal of ore from some of the claims. Defendants counterclaimed to have title quieted in them. From a judgment in favor of the defendants based on a finding of plaintiffs’ failure to meet the statutory assessment. work requirement, plaintiffs appeal attacking that finding.

Plaintiff Silliman is the successor in interest of Utah Alloy Ores to approximately 84 mining claims and one millsite in the Yellow Cat mining…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Chambers v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Jackson v. RobySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Rucker v. DaltonUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Romrell v. Zions First National Bank, N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bastian v. KingUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API