Legal Opinion
Rosenfield v. Vosper
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 18, 1945No. Civ. 14200PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal from an order holding the trial judge in the case, Honorable William R. McKay, not disqualified to rule on a motion for new trial. The case has been on appeal before. Plaintiff, who is an attorney at law, recovered a judgment of $12,567.32 as the value of legal services rendered to the defendants, and this was reversed on appeal (Rosenfield v. Vosper (1941), 45 Cal.App.2d 365 [114 P.2d 29]). The costs of that appeal, amounting to $1,932.30, were assessed against plaintiff (Rosenfield v. Vosper (1943), 57 Cal.App.2d 605, 611 [134 P.2d 529, 135 P.2d 579]). On February 2, 1942,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Rosenfield v. VosperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Thomas v. DriscollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Estate of RabinowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Collins v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Goehring v. Chapman UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Ensher, Alexander & Barsoom, Inc. v. EnsherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- City of Coronado v. Cal. Coastal Zone Conservation Comm'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.