Legal Opinion
Koskoff v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 28, 1992No. 10594PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The plaintiff landowner appeals from the trial court’s denial of his request for an order of mandamus to compel the defendants, the Haddam planning and zoning commission and its chairman, to approve a subdivision. He claims that the trial court failed to find that the commission’s failure to act within the sixty-five day period allowed by General Statutes § 8-26d (b)1 results in automatic approval of his subdivision application. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following undisputed facts are pertinent. On August 14, 1989, the plaintiff applied to the commis*445sion for approval of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Winchester Woods Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Winslow v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fulco v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals of CoventrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Cross v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Koskoff v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Lauver v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.