Legal Opinion

Koskoff v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 28, 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 443, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s decision and remand the case with direction to grant the writ of mandamus on the ground that a failure of a planning and zoning commission properly to publish a prehearing notice, as required by General Statutes § 8-26, amounted to a failure of the commission to act pursuant to General Statutes §§ 8-26 and 8-26d?”

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Koskoff v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals of CoventrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Lauver v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. Equity One, Inc. v. ShiversConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Williams v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Center Shops of East Granby, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API