Legal Opinion

United States v. Comi

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 15, 1958No. Civ. No. 9566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

The question presently before the court is whether the defendants Hepbron and Brennan are entitled to a jury trial ■on the issues raised by their answer and their cross-claim filed herein.

The complaint alleges that during the months of August, September and October, 1955, the defendant Comi was engaged in the business of accepting wagers or conducting a wagering pool or lottery. Wagers in the amount of $169,-854.08 were placed with him or in such pool or lottery, which were subject to the excise tax imposed by 26 U.S.C.A. § 4401. Jeopardy assessments of such taxes were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Mercantile Trust Co. v. HofferbertDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1944
  3. United States v. PettyjohnDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949
  4. United States v. SchuermannDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Geisel v. Poynter Products Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. United States v. DamskyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API