United States v. Comi
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
The question presently before the court is whether the defendants Hepbron and Brennan are entitled to a jury trial ■on the issues raised by their answer and their cross-claim filed herein.
The complaint alleges that during the months of August, September and October, 1955, the defendant Comi was engaged in the business of accepting wagers or conducting a wagering pool or lottery. Wagers in the amount of $169,-854.08 were placed with him or in such pool or lottery, which were subject to the excise tax imposed by 26 U.S.C.A. § 4401. Jeopardy assessments of such taxes were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. HofferbertDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1944
- United States v. PettyjohnDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949
- United States v. SchuermannDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1952
3Cited by2 opinions
- Geisel v. Poynter Products Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- United States v. DamskyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960