United States v. Damsky
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, District Judge.
The Government moves to strike the defendants’ timely demand for a trial by jury. This is an action brought pursuant to section 7403 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 7403, to foreclose a tax lien and for further and related relief. Section 7402 of the Code, 26 U.S.C. § 7402, vests jurisdiction in this Court. The complaint alleges nonpayment of income taxes for the years 1945-1949 after due assessment and demand, and that the appropriate notices of liens have been filed. There are four defendants: Bernard and Olga Damsky are husband and wife and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Wickwire v. ReineckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pease v. Rathbun-Jones Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Paul Pipola and Julia Pipola v. Mae Chicco and Yorkville Savings and Loan Association, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bernard Damsky, Olga Damsky and Henry Birns v. Honorable Joseph C. Zavatt, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Sidney J. Gefen and Lois Gefen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Innersprings, Inc. v. Joseph Aronauer, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1961
- United States v. MalakieDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Bernard Damsky, Olga Damsky and Henry Birns v. Honorable Joseph C. Zavatt, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.