Legal Opinion
Geisel v. Poynter Products Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 9, 1968No. 68 Civ. 997PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLANDS, District Judge:
The within motion for a preliminary injunction is granted. This opinion sets forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law which are the grounds of the Court’s action (Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a)) and the reasons for the granting of the injunction pendente lite (Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(a) (2)).
The complaint pleads five causes of action. The plaintiff’s claims are based on five different “theories”: (1) violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1125; (2) violation of New York General Business Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 20 § 368-d; (3) violation of New York Civil Rights…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Parkway Baking Co. v. Freihofer Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Federal-Mogul-Bower Bearings, Inc. v. AzoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Hesmer Foods, Inc. v. Campbell Soup CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Boston Professional Hockey Association, Inc. v. Dallas Cap & Emblem Mfg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Tom Waits v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Tracy-Locke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Johnson & Johnson v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Quabaug Rubber Company v. Fabiano Shoe Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.