Legal Opinion

United States v. Schuermann

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided July 1, 1952No. 8441(2)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

106 F.Supp. 86 (1952)

UNITED STATES

v.

SCHUERMANN et al.

No. 8441(2).

United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.

July 1, 1952.

George L. Robertson, U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., Harold Bacon, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., and Allan McD. Goodloe, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Harry N. Soffer and Joseph Nessenfeld, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant Oscar Lehr.

Dubinsky & Duggan and Jerome F. Duggan, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant St. Louis Finance Co.

HULEN, District Judge.

The question for ruling is — can plaintiff by this action secure control for sale purposes of capital stock in,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. North American Co. v. KoernerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  2. Diel v. StegnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Osmer v. LeMay-Wegmann Brokerage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis H. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Buffalo Pipeline Co. v. Bell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  3. United States v. NewhardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Cartledge v. Sinclair Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. United States v. ComiDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API