Legal Opinion

State v. Blank

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 16, 1996No. 17470-7-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.

Paul C. Blank objects to the inclusion of certain items in a cost bill filed by the State of Washington after it prevailed in the underlying appeal of this criminal case. At issue is the application of a new statute, RCW 10.73.160, which permits State recoupment of fees for court-appointed counsel and of expenses incurred in producing a verbatim report of proceedings and clerk’s papers. Initially, a commissioner of this court considered the cost bill, as provided by RAP 14.2. The commissioner referred the matter to a panel of judges. We hold that RCW 10.73.160.applies retroactively, and we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. BarklindWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. KeeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Detonics ".45" Associates v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API