State v. Blank
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.
Paul C. Blank objects to the inclusion of certain items in a cost bill filed by the State of Washington after it prevailed in the underlying appeal of this criminal case. At issue is the application of a new statute, RCW 10.73.160, which permits State recoupment of fees for court-appointed counsel and of expenses incurred in producing a verbatim report of proceedings and clerk’s papers. Initially, a commissioner of this court considered the cost bill, as provided by RAP 14.2. The commissioner referred the matter to a panel of judges. We hold that RCW 10.73.160.applies retroactively, and we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BarklindWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. KeeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Detonics ".45" Associates v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.