Legal Opinion

State v. Brewster

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 26, 2009No. 62764-3-IPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

¶1 This case requires us to decide whether the saving statute applies to the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) collection fee provision. Because the saving statute, chapter 10.01 RCW, applies only to criminal and punitive enactments and the DNA fee is not punitive, the saving clause does not apply, and the provision in effect at the time of sentencing controls. Brandy Brewster’s sentence *858for possession of cocaine therefore correctly includes the mandatory DNA fee.

FACTS

¶2 Brandy Brewster was arrested on November 15,2006 for possession of cocaine. She was convicted following a trial. At sentencing,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. MathersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State Of Washington v. Tommie LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API