Legal Opinion

State v. Nolan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 22, 1999No. 41646-4-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, C.J.

Thomas Robertson Nolan asks us to modify the ruling of a commissioner of this court awarding costs to the State as authorized by RCW 10.73.160, Title 14 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, and State v. Blank, 131 Wn.2d 230, 930 P.2d 1213 (1997). Relying on State v. Edgley, 92 Wn. App. 478, 483-84, 966 P.2d 381 (1998), review denied, 137 Wn.2d 1026 (1999), Nolan contends that the purpose of awarding costs to the prevailing party on appeal is to discourage meritless appeals and that, although this court affirmed his conviction, because his appeal raised debatable issues the State’s cost bill…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. NichollsIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. SmitsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Dawn Marie Sullivan, AppellantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. State Of Washington v. Terry Joel CaverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API