Legal Opinion

State v. Barklind

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1976No. 43827PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*815Brachtenbach, J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of second-degree burglary. At the preliminary hearing he was found to be indigent and an attorney was appointed at public expense to represent him. At sentencing the court deferred sentence and granted probation as a condition of which defendant was ordered to pay the county, under terms hereafter described, $150 as reimbursement for a portion of the expense of his court-appointed attorney. Defendant challenges the constitutionality of that portion of the order deferring sentence and granting probation upon the condition that he reimburse…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. James v. StrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. GerardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Decker v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. People v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API