County of Santa Barbara v. More
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. E. W. Squier, District Attorney, and Fred H. Schaner, Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Hollister Avenue is the principal highway leading from the city of Santa Barbara in the county of the same name, to the west and north. Defendant John F. More owns a four hundred acre tract of land fronting on the southerly line of this highway. The highway boundaries are and for long have been defined by substantial fences on either side. More than twenty years ago, More planted ornamental trees along this highway between the roadway proper and his fence. He owns the fee of the land to the center line of the highway. These trees are native black walnuts, poplars, silver-leaf…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Donahue v. . Keystone Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Baker v. Town of NormalIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Chipman v. EmericCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cooper v. Liberty National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
- Abar v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. SweetserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Commonwealth ex rel. Keck v. ShouseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
- Village of Cattaraugus v. Johnson, New York County Courts1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.