Legal Opinion

Village of Cattaraugus v. Johnson

New York County Courts

Decided February 26, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The action is brought by the village to recover a ten-dollar penalty under village ordinance No. 41, which reads as follows: “No person shall in any manner injure or destroy any shade tree in the streets or parks of the village; nor hitch any team, horse, or other animal, at or to such shade tree, or near enough thereto so that such shade tree may be injured thereby, under a penalty of ten dollars for each and every offense.”

The facts were stipulated in Justice Court as follows: “ It is stipulated on the record in the trial of this action that the following are the facts:

“ That the plaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Yates v. HathawayNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. Donahue v. . Keystone Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. People Ex Rel. M. Wineburgh Advertising Co. v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. City of Buffalo v. . PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Palmer v. . Larchmont Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Village of MexicoNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports2011
  3. Village of Cattaraugus v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API