Legal Opinion

Stocin v. C. R. Wilson Body Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1919No. Docket No. 81PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Peter Stocin presented his claim for compensation against the C. R. Wilson Body Company for injuries received in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant and the Royal Indemnity Company, insurer, bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The respondent C. R. Wilson Body Company was engaged in the manufacture of automobile bodies on October 8, 1917, and was operating under the workmen’s compensation act of the State of Michigan. The Royal Indemnity Company was on that date the insurer of the C. R. Wilson Body Company. It *2is agreed that on that date the plaintiff was an employee of the C. R. Wilson Body Company, that he received an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment and that his wages were $21.60 a week. The said injury resulting in a crushed arm at the junction of the upper and middle third,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northwestern Iron Co. v. Indusrrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Nichols's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Scott M Cain v. Waste Management IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mitchell v. Metal Assemblies, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Reno v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Palazzolo v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API