Legal Opinion

People v. Lee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1994No. Docket Nos. 96876, 96877, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

In this case, we are called upon to determine whether there is probable cause to find that a loan occurred within the meaning of the usury statute, MCL 438.41; MSA 19.15(51), where a person purchases a used watch and grants the seller an option to later repurchase the watch at a significantly higher price. Specifically, we must decide whether there was probable cause to believe that defendants’ act of exchanging $2,600 for a used Rolex and an option to repurchase the watch a month later for $3,250 plus four percent sales tax constitutes a loan. We conclude that there was not probable cause to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Dussia v. MONROE CTY. EMP. RET. SYS.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Dussia v. Monroe County Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Karl v. Bryant Air Conditioning Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Joseph Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Chiles v. Machine Shop, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Lawsuit Financial, LLC v. CurryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Alcona County v. Wolverine Environmental Production, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Grand Traverse County v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API