Legal Opinion · Dissent

Palazzolo v. Bradley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1959No. Docket 27, Calendar 47,736PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1DissentDethmers, C. J.

Plaintiff received .an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. It necessitated amputation of a fraction ■of the first phalange of his left thumb. Defendants concede that what remains of that phalange is of no more value to him than if it had been removed at the joint. He was paid compensation for 2 weeks while disabled and then compensation benefits were stopped because there was no further loss of wage-earning capacity. Plaintiff’s claim is for compensation for specific loss of 1/2 the thumb under the statute. He appeals from the order of the appeal board affirming the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Van Dorpel v. Haven-Busch Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. In Re the Claims of PetrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Lovalo v. Michigan Stamping Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Rench v. Kalamazoo Stove & Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Metal Assemblies, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Williams v. LangMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Elliott v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Blizek v. Eagle Signal CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Johnson v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API