Legal Opinion

Scott M Cain v. Waste Management Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2005No. Docket 125111, 125180PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFTER REMAND

TAYLOR, C.J.

At issue in this worker’s compensation case is whether a worker must suffer an actual amputation of a limb or body part in order to qualify for either specific loss benefits (also described as scheduled loss benefits) or total and permanent disability benefits. We hold that specific loss benefits under MCL 418.361(2) do not require an amputation. It is sufficient to qualify for such benefits if the limb or body part has *240lost its usefulness. Regarding total and permanent disability benefits under MCL 418.361(3)(b), which covers the loss of both legs, as with specific…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Old Republic InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gladych v. New Family Homes, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. G C Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ronnisch Construction Group, Inc v. Lofts on the Nine, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Benton v. Dart Properties Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Karaczewski v. Farbman Stein & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. in Re Certified Question (Deacon v. Pandora)Michigan Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Shivers v. SchmiegeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API