Reno v. Holmes
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
The plaintiff received an industrial accident necessitating the amputation of his left leg about five and one-half inches below the knee joint. By agreement he was paid compensation for the loss of a foot, 125 weeks. This proceeding was instituted to recover further compensation for an additional period of 50 weeks upon the claim that he had lost a leg within the meaning of the workmen’s compensation act. We will first take up some of defendants’ contentions. The facts are not in dispute, and we can not accede to defendants’ claim that the determination of the department of labor and industry…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roach v. Kelsey Wheel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Addison v. W. E. Wood Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Curtis v. Hayes Wheel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Payne v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Stocin v. C. R. Wilson Body Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Scott M Cain v. Waste Management IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Rench v. Kalamazoo Stove & Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Mitchell v. Metal Assemblies, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Loucks v. BaumanMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- West v. Postum Co., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.